<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATE: Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Horsepower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/editorial/update-dodge-challenger-rst-horsepower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/editorial/update-dodge-challenger-rst-horsepower/</link>
	<description>A new breed of automotive performance shop.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:02:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Challenger Stock Dyno Graph</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/editorial/update-dodge-challenger-rst-horsepower/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>New Challenger Stock Dyno Graph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/blog/?p=124#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] to make due with a link. I know this may be old news to some but figured I&#039;d still post. EnjoY!!  National Speed </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to make due with a link. I know this may be old news to some but figured I&#8217;d still post. EnjoY!!  National Speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/editorial/update-dodge-challenger-rst-horsepower/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalspeedinc.com/blog/?p=124#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Please note, this was through an automatic transmission... It&#039;s actually right on, figure a 20% drivetrain loss through the automatic, and what&#039;s 20% of 425? 340. Not a bad number if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note, this was through an automatic transmission&#8230; It&#8217;s actually right on, figure a 20% drivetrain loss through the automatic, and what&#8217;s 20% of 425? 340. Not a bad number if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
